Intrusion Traffic Detection and Characterization using Deep Image Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The security community has witnessed an unprecedented upsurge in cyber attacks in recent years. These attacks have proved to be successful in achieving their catastrophic objectives. Intrusion detection and prevention systems remain the principal point of defense against these devastating attacks. However, most of the anomaly datasets in the past are neither up-to-date nor reliable. Researchers used various machine learning techniques to classify anomaly-based attacks due to their capability to keep pace with the evolution of such attacks and gave encouraging predictions. Nevertheless, deep neural networks turned out to be revolutionary in detecting and characterizing such intrusions. In this paper, first of all, we propose an imagebased deep neural model to classify various attacks by using two comprehensive datasets called CICIDS2017 and CSE-CICIDS2018. Secondly, we provide a list of best network flow features to identify these attacks. We deploy a convolutional neural network model to classify and characterize different attacks with promising evaluation results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it