La revue Francofonia, vitrine litteraire pour le Quebec en Italie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La revue Francofonia, semestriel fondé à Bologne en 1981, a eu un rôle majeur dans la diffusion de la littérature et de la critique québécoi- ses en Italie. Présentes dès les premières années aux sommaires de la re- vue, les études québécoises deviennent une constante au fil des ans. Cette « fidélité » est garantie par la présence, dans le même département uni- versitaire où la revue a son siège, d’un Centre d’études québécoises (CSQ, devenu ensuite le Centre interuniversitaire d’études québécoises, CISQ), d’un doctorat en Littératures francophones et d’un lecteur québécois à mandat variable qui collabore au CISQ et à la revue à la fois. La présente étude contient un petit historique de la présence du Québec dans Fran- cofonia, ainsi qu’un instantané d’ensemble : quelques chiffres et quelques pourcentages permettront de mesurer l’importance de cette véritable « vi- trine littéraire » pour le Québec en Italie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".