MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

54 Patient stratification using clinical proteomics – validated multiplexed MRM assays to quantify HER2 and other biomarkers in clinical FFPE tissues

2020· article· en· W3105595935 on OpenAlexaff
Maxim Isabelle, Michael Schirm, Gwënaël Pottiez, Rudolf Guilbaud, Lorella Di Donato

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCaprion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomarkerBiomarker discoveryQuantitative proteomicsMultiplexSelected reaction monitoringProteomicsRepeatabilityReproducibilityComputational biologyChemistryBiologyMass spectrometryBioinformaticsTandem mass spectrometryChromatographyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The advent of precision oncology has led a shift towards biomarker-driven clinical trial designs and molecular profiling of individual patients. Identification of patients with the target biomarker profile may be useful in guiding patient selection as an enrichment strategy for clinical trials. Targeted multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) analysis for multiplexed quantitation of biomarker proteins in FFPE tissue provides direct, more accurate and precise quantification over current ‘gold standard’ immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods. However, MRM-MS has not yet been broadly applied to clinical trials. In this study, we demonstrate the systematic development, optimization and analytical validation of quantitative, multiplexed MRM-MS assays for robust biomarker quantification in clinical FFPE tissues, including sample analysis under GCLP. Results from an MRM panel targeting 8 clinically relevant biomarker proteins will also be shown, including the measured HER2 levels in FFPE breast tumors classified by IHC as 0, 1+, 2+ or 3+. Methods MRM-MS biomarker panels were developed and optimized for multiplexed quantitation of ≤12 proteins, in which unique peptides derived from each target protein were monitored as a surrogate measure of protein levels. Tumor regions from FFPE tissue sections were dissected using laser capture or macrodissection, solubilized, digested with trypsin to generate peptides for analysis, spiked with fixed levels of stable isotope labeled (SIL) peptide standards, and analyzed by MRM-MS. Analytical validation was performed per NCI CPTAC guidelines, including response curves, assay repeatability, selectivity, stability, and reproducibility of endogenous detection. Clinical performance was assessed using commercially sourced FFPE-tumor tissues, including a cohort of breast tumor tissues with a wide range of HER2 expression. Results Assay performance results were protein/peptide dependent, with sensitivity in the low pg/µg total protein range. For HER2, assay linearity was demonstrated over 2.5 to 3 orders of magnitude, with a precision and accuracy of <15% over 3 independent runs. In sample analysis, the MRM-MS was sufficiently sensitive to detect HER2 in 1 µg total protein from FFPE breast tumor classified by IHC as negative (0). Conclusions GCLP-compliant quantitative multiplexed large-scale clinical analysis of protein biomarkers by MRM-MS in FFPE tissue is feasible and enables precise and accurate quantitation of proteins when IHC methods are unsuitable or unavailable. Data can be used for patient stratification, optimization of treatment outcomes, drug resistance prediction, and to support clinical development of novel therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207