The T Tauri Phase Down to Nearly Planetary Masses: Echelle Spectra of 82 Very Low Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the largest high-resolution spectroscopic sample to date of young, very low mass stars (VLMS) and brown dwarfs (BDs), we investigate disk accretion in objects ranging from just above the hydrogen-burning limit all the way to nearly planetary masses. Our 82 targets span spectral types from M5 to M9.5, or masses from 0.15 Msun down to ~15 Jupiters. They are confirmed members of the rho Oph, Taurus, Cha I, IC 348, R CrA, Upper Sco and TW Hydrae regions, with ages <1 to ~10 Myr. The sample contains 41 BDs (spectral types >= M6.5). We find that: (1) classical T Tauri-like disk-accretion persists in the BD domain down to nearly the deuterium-burning limit; (2) in addition to H-alpha, permitted emission lines of CaII, OI and HeI are also good accretion indicators, as in CTTs; (3) the CaII 8662A flux is an excellent quantitative measure of the accretion rate (Mdot) in VLMS and BDs(as in CTTs); (4) Mdot diminishes as M^2 -- our measurements support previous findings of this correlation, and extend it to the entire range of sub-stellar masses; (5) the accretor fraction among VLMS and BDs decreases substantially with age, as in higher-mass stars; (6) at any given age, the VLMS and BD accretor fraction is comparable to that in higher-mass stars; and (7) a number of sources with IR disk excesses do not evince measurable accretion, with the incidence of such a mismatch increasing with age: this implies that disks in the low mass regime can persist beyond the main accretion phase, and parallels the transition from the classical to post-T Tauri stage in more massive stars. These strong similarities at young ages, between higher-mass stars and low-mass bodies close to and below the hydrogen-burning limit, are consistent with a common formation mechanism in the two mass regimes. (abridged)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".