MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3105648189

A gamma-ray burst remnant in our Galaxy : HESS J1303-631

2005· article· en· W3105648189 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGamma-ray burstAstrophysicsSupernova remnantGalaxyGalactic planeSupernovaInterstellar mediumGamma rayAstronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The H.E.S.S. (High Energy Stereoscopic System) collaboration recently reported the discovery of a bright and extended TeV gamma-ray source HESS J1303-631, which remains notably silent in all other wavebands, and is the second of an emerging class of unidentified TeV sources serendipitously discovered in the Galactic plane. Here we present the results of our investigation of the multiwavelength data on HESS J1303-631 which strongly suggest its identification as the remnant of a Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) in our own Galaxy. Long GRBs are thought to originate from the collapse of the cores of evolved very massive stars into black holes producing narrow relativistic outflows pointed to the Earth. We show that the unique power of GRBs and the specific characteristics of relativistic shock acceleration produce GRB remnants (GRBRs), large nebulae that brightly glow in TeV gamma-rays while hardly emitting at longer wavelengths. We predict spectral and spatial signatures that unambiguously distinguish GRBRs from ordinary supernova remnants, including: large energy budgets inferred from their TeV emission but suppressed fluxes in the radio through GeV wavebands; extended centre-filled emission with an energy-dependent spatial profile; and a possible elongation in the direction of the GRB jets. GRBRs can best be identified by ground-based gamma-ray detectors, with the future GLAST mission playing a crucial role in confirming the predicted low level of GeV emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207