MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3105809257 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-14170

Power Supply Induced Jitter Including the Ground Bounce and Transmission Media Effects

2020· dissertation· en· W3105809257 on OpenAlexaff
Ahsan Javaid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJitterTransmission lineElectronic engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Noise (video)Power (physics)Computer scienceElectric power transmissionSIGNAL (programming language)Signal integrityLine (geometry)Ground bounceEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageTelecommunicationsTransistorMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, an efficient method for estimation of power supply induced jitter (PSIJ) in high-speed designs is presented.EMPSIJ [34] method is advanced to handle the combined effects of both the transmission media and ground bounce in the presence of supply noise.Semi-analytical relations are developed based on small-signal noise analysis for quick estimation of PSIJ and one bit simulation of the large signal model.For this purpose, small-signal configuration of a voltage-mode driver circuit is considered to evaluate the differential output response.Also, an alternative and systematic approach is proposed based on MNA tridiagonal formulation and Thomas Algorithm for PSIJ analysis.It avoids re-derivation of the expressions in the case of any change in load conditions.Also, a novel closed-form model for transmission line type interconnects is developed relating the input and the output nodes of the transmission line which enables efficient PSIJ analysis in the presence of PCB traces.The proposed closed-form expression for transmission line type interconnects is also advanced to include the effect of load.Several validating examples are presented for the proposed approaches using different types of noise sources.The results are compared with HSPICE simulator to validate the accuracy and efficiency.i My sincere gratitudes to my thesis supervisor Prof. R. Achar, for his patience, motivation and immense knowledge.Without his precious support and guidance, it would not be possible to conduct this research.His office door was always open

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207