MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3105813438 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.200791-f

La chirurgie en crise à l’ère de la COVID-19 : changements transformationnels en vue

2020· article· fr· W3105813438 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David R. Urbach, Danielle Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)BetacoronavirusHumanitiesCoronavirus InfectionsMedicinePhilosophyVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)OutbreakPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POINTS CLÉS La fermeture des services en réponse à la pandémie de maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) a mis sur pause les chirurgies non urgentes au Canada. On estime qu’il y a eu 45 000 chirurgies de moins que le nombre attendu chez des adultes présentant des maladies non cancéreuses en

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts→French-language works237,207→