MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3105859121 · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28508-5

Floquet Weyl Magnons in Three-Dimensional Quantum Magnets

2018· article· en· W3105859121 on OpenAlexafffund
S. A. Owerre

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueIndustry CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsFloquet theoryMagnonPhysicsDegenerate energy levelsQuantumCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsPoint reflectionMagnetQuantum electrodynamicsFerromagnetismNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In three-dimensional (3D) quantum magnets, magnonic Weyl points (WPs) featuring linear band crossing of two non-degenerate magnon branches can emerge in certain lattice geometry when time-reversal symmetry is broken macroscopically. Unfortunately, there are very limited 3D quantum magnets that host magnonic WPs, and they are yet to be observed experimentally because the intrinsic perturbative interactions that break time-reversal symmetry macroscopically can be very negligible. Here, we present an alternative means via photo-irradiation, in which magnonic WPs can emerge in 3D quantum magnets without relying on intrinsic perturbative interactions to break time-reversal symmetry. By utilizing the magnonic Floquet-Bloch theory, we put forward the general theory of magnonic Floquet WPs in 3D quantum magnets. We show that periodically driven 3D magnonic Dirac nodal-line (DNL) and 3D magnonic gapped trivial insulators can generate 3D magnonic Floquet WPs, which can be tuned by the incident circularly-polarized light. We demonstrate the existence of magnonic Floquet WPs by combining the study of the magnon dispersions, Berry curvatures, and the anomalous thermal Hall effect. The general theoretical formalism can be applied to different magnetic insulators, and thus extending the concept of magnonic WPs to a broader class of 3D magnetically ordered systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207