MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3105874006 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt20.215

Parallel Finite Element Approach for large Thermal Problems Applied to Glass Bending Furnace

2020· article· en· W3105874006 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marc Baydoun

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodThermalBendingMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringComposite materialEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, iterative sub-structuring methods are applied to an FEM discretized model of an industrial glass thermoforming furnace. The FEM-based model is dubbed the component interaction network (CIN) and has been previously used in many thermal problems modelling. Applying iterative sub-structuring methods to CIN led to the creation of multi-CIN, used for large heat problems, in particular the glass thermoforming furnace problem. The substructures are then simulated simultaneously using the same direct thermal solver used for the general problem. Multiprocessing technology was exploited for parallel solving of the sub-structures, while a coupling algorithm handled interfacial coupling. In addition, a time-marching scheme was developed, including a coarse numerical problem solving for stabilization phases and adaptive time stepping for stable repetitive phases. The model was compared to the experimental measurements. The results were met with good reproduction of the thermal behavior of the components and acceptable accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207