MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3106000040 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13730

WAVE-2 and Its Role in LRRK2 Mediated Neuroinflammation

2019· dissertation· en· W3106000040 on OpenAlexaff
Jawaria Abdali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroinflammationMicrogliaCell biologyBiologyActin cytoskeletonActinPhenotypeCytoskeletonImmunologyNeuroscienceInflammationCellGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroinflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's Disease, primarily resulting from microglial activation.Microglia are the primary phagocytic cells of the central nervous system, and their activation play a significant role in neuroinflammation.Microglial activation and the changes in their morphological appearance depend on the actin cytoskeleton reorganization.WASP family Verprolin-homologous protein-2 (WAVE2), a member of Wiskott Aldrich's Syndrome Proteins, is a primary regulator of actin cytoskeleton.WAVE2 primarily expresses in immune cells and has an important role in cytoskeleton reorganization, which is a crucial process for cell motility and formation of various cellular processes.This study is aimed to test the effect of WAVE2 inhibition on inflammatory phenotype of BV-2 microglial cells.We have shown that lipopolysaccharides (LPS) stimulation significantly upregulates oxidative stress and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kB) signaling, and cause changes in appearance of BV-2 microglial cells.Knocking down WAVE2 with the help of adenoassociated virus vector does not block these outcomes.These data suggest that the inflammatory phenotype of microglial cells may not be primarily dependent on WAVE2 signaling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→