MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106022252 · doi:10.4000/histoiremesure.12702

À la recherche des potiers métrologues mésopotamiens

2020· article· fr· W3106022252 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Nicolle

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire & Mesure · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Egypt and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’approche métrologique est encore rare dans les études céramologiques. Elle vise principalement à déterminer l’existence de capacités ou d’unités standardisées. L’insuccès des quelques rares tentatives d’établir une équivalence précise entre un vase céramique et une unité de capacité volumétrique ne doit cependant pas aboutir à un abandon des recherches métrologiques. Au contraire, il faut systématiser les mesures du volume des pots. Une étude conduite sur la céramique Khabour montre que ce type d’approche permet de dépasser le stade des études chrono-stratigraphiques. Grâce à une approche émique du travail des anciens potiers, il est alors possible de réaliser des recherches sur des « habitus céramiques » envisagés comme des normes culturelles communes et consensuelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.297
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.016 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire & MesureSame topicAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207