MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106035138

Universal subspaces for local unitary groups of fermionic systems

2016· article· en· W3106035138 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Chen, Jianxin Chen, Bei Zeng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear subspaceCombinatoricsOrthonormal basisSubspace topologyPhysicsHilbert spaceMathematicsBasis (linear algebra)Unitary stateState (computer science)Mathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisGeometryAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $${\mathcal{V}=\wedge^{N} V}$$ be the N-fermion Hilbert space with M-dimensional single particle space V and 2N ≤ M. We refer to the unitary group G of V as the local unitary (LU) group. We fix an orthonormal (o.n.) basis |v 1⟩,...,|v M 〉 of V. Then the Slater determinants $${e_{i_1,\cdots,i_N}:= |{v_{i_1}\wedge v_{i_2} \wedge\cdots\wedge v_{i_N}}\rangle}$$ with i 1 < ... < i N form an o.n. basis of $${\mathcal{V}}$$ . Let $${\mathcal{S}\subseteq\mathcal{V}}$$ be the subspace spanned by all $${e_{i_1,\cdots,i_N}}$$ such that the set {i 1,...,i N } contains no pair {2k−1,2k}, k an integer. We say that the $${|{\psi}\rangle \in\mathcal{S}}$$ are single occupancy states (with respect to the basis |v 1⟩,...,|v M ⟩). We prove that for N = 3 the subspace $${\mathcal{S}}$$ is universal, i.e., each G-orbit in $${\mathcal{V}}$$ meets $${\mathcal{S}}$$ , and that this is false for N > 3. If M is even, the well known BCS states are not LU-equivalent to any single occupancy state. Our main result is that for N = 3 and M even there is a universal subspace $${\mathcal{W}\subseteq\mathcal{S}}$$ spanned by M(M−1)(M−5)/6 states $${e_{i_1,\ldots,i_N}}$$ . Moreover, the number M(M−1)(M−5)/6 is minimal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207