MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 13167: Early Mobilization in Postoperative Cardiac Surgical Patients

2020· article· en· W3106039091 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Goldfarb, Diana Dima, Yves Langlois

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiac surgeryMobilizationIntensive care unitAdverse effectEmergency medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Early mobilization (EM) is recommended by cardiac surgical societies. However, the optimal method of EM delivery has yet to be determined. Our objective was to assess whether a bedside nurse-driven EM strategy is safe and associated with improved outcomes following cardiac surgery. Methods: Consecutive post-cardiac surgery patients in a cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) at an academic tertiary care centre from 2017 to 2019 prior to and after EM program implementation were reviewed. Postoperative cardiac surgery patients were initially managed in a general ICU and transferred to the CVICU when hemodynamic stability was achieved, typically postoperative day 1 or 2. Functional status was assessed by the nurse on CVICU admission using the Level of Function (LOF) Mobility Scale, which ranges from LOF 0 (bed immobile) to LOF 5 (walks > 50 feet). The nurse uses the LOF score to guide twice-daily level-specific mobility activities. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. Results: There were 504 patients included in the study (preintervention, N=329; Intervention, N=175). There was no difference in age, sex or comorbid illness between the groups (Table). The LOF was 4.7 ± 0.5 prior to surgery, 3.4 ± 1.1 on CVICU admission, and 4.3 ± 0.6 on CVICU discharge in patients undergoing EM. Patients were mobilized during nearly all mobilization opportunities (98.7%; 685/694). Adverse events were rare (0.4%; 8 events/1901 mobilization activities), minor and transient. There was no difference is postoperative hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, discharge home or 30-day hospital re-admission (all P>0.05). Conclusion: A nurse-driven EM program was safe and associated with improvement in functional status in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. The EM program was not associated with improved short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand optimal delivery of EM in cardiac surgical patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→