MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106148427 · doi:10.1521/jsyt.2020.39.3.15

Introduction to the Special Section: Walk-in Single-Session and Booked Single-Session Therapy in Canada

2020· article· en· W3106148427 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nancy McElheran, Sandy Harper-Jaques, Ann M. Lawson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systemic Therapies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)Walk-inSection (typography)Special sectionPsychologyMedicineComputer scienceEngineeringAlternative medicineWorld Wide WebEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Walk-in single session and single session by appointment therapy services have been in existence for the past 50 years in North America. Dimensions of this approach were outlined in this journal in both 2008 and again in 2019 (Slive & Bobele, 2019, Slive, McElheran, & Lawson, 2008). In this introduction to the Special Section on Walk-In Single-Session and Booked Single-Session Services in Canada, the authors will provide an overview of some of the current walk-in single-session and booked single-session services in place and/or in progress at various locations across the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systemic TherapiesSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207