Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans ce laboratoire des formes romanesques qu'est le XVIIIe siècle français, Marivaux et sa Vie de Marianne tiennent une place particulière et en partie méconnue. Marivaux s'y détourne de l'ironique surenchère fictionnelle qu'il avait auparavant pratiquée dans ses « antiromans », sans pourtant se soumettre aux conventions qui régissent le vraisemblable romanesque de son époque. L'identité non authentifiable de Marianne est prétexte (mais prétexte seulement) à l'exploration de deux modes d'apparition de la vérité en régime romanesque : la « véridicité » (qui déplace de l'énoncé à l'énonciatrice la question de la vérité, devenue celle de la véracité) et la véridiction (qui, en faisant de la structure même du roman le lieu d'une possible vérité romanesque, esquive la dénonciation d'une fausseté inhérente au genre brandie par les adversaires du roman). Michel Foucault, puis Oswald Ducrot et sa théorie des présuppositions, seront principalement nos guides dans cette relecture de La Vie de Marianne en termes de véridicité et véridiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".