Women in the Principality of Antioch: Power, Status, and Social Agency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Situated at the easternmost edge of Latin Christendom, the principality of Antioch (1098–1268) was a polity of great social and political complexity. It was formed following the First Crusade, and the Western Europeans who first settled there, and the generations who succeeded them, navigated a dynamic political and demographic landscape which in turn had a significant bearing on the nature of settlement and society. As may be expected for a state founded through war, and subject to frequent warfare and diplomatic negotiations, most historians of the principality have focused on its military and political history. Examination of its underlying social structures, in particular the experiences of women, has been sparser, save for select studies on Antioch's princesses and noble families.3 In part, this is a product of the available source material. We lack a Latin Christian narrative internal to Antioch after the 1120s, and what we do have largely treats women as tangential, if at all. On the other hand, there is ample documentary and legal evidence with which to build a fuller picture of the experiences and roles played by the female inhabitants of the principality. Furthermore, modern understanding of the principality is yet to properly engage with, and take advantage of, the wealth of recent historiography which has sought to de-exceptionalize female power. Such debates have considered the meaning of terms like ‘power’ and ‘agency’, such as they relate to the female experience in the Middle Ages, arguing that any understanding of power, its expression, and its experience should not simply be reduced to those elements traditionally gendered masculine, and so consider women involved in authority as extraordinary. Rather, as Theresa Earenfight has noted, ‘when we imagine … wide concentric circles of power, agency, and influence, we situate women of all ranks firmly within the imagined community of the realm’. In other words, power and agency could exist in many forms, with women not occasional, extraordinary actors, but fundamental to the political sphere, able to exercise authority over their and others’ destinies. It is the aim of this essay, therefore, to offer the first comprehensive examination of the social, legal, and political status of women in the principality of Antioch.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".