On Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle in Digital Mammograms by Means of Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has long become an integral part of radiological management of breast disease, facilitating a number of important clinical applications, including quantitative assessment of breast density and early detection of malignancies based on X-ray mammography. Common to such applications is the need to automatically discriminate between breast tissue and adjacent anatomy, with the latter being predominantly represented by pectoralis major (or pectoral muscle). Especially in the case of mammograms acquired in the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view, the muscle is easily confusable with some elements of breast anatomy due to their morphological and photometric similarity. As a result, the problem of automatic detection and segmentation of pectoral muscle in MLO mammograms remains a challenging task, innovative approaches to which are still required and constantly searched for. To address this problem, the present paper introduces a two-step segmentation strategy based on a combined use of data-driven prediction (deep learning) and graph-based image processing. In particular, the proposed method employs a convolutional neural network (CNN) which is designed to predict the location of breast-pectoral boundary at different levels of spatial resolution. Subsequently, the predictions are used by the second stage of the algorithm, in which the desired boundary is recovered as a solution to the shortest path problem on a specially designed graph. The proposed algorithm has been tested on three different datasets (i.e., MIAS, CBIS-DDSm, and InBreast) using a range of quantitative metrics. The results of comparative analysis show considerable improvement over state-of-the-art, while offering the possibility of model-free and fully automatic processing. The average values of dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and accuracy (ACC) on the mentioned three datasets are 97.22 ± 1.96% and 99.64±.27%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".