The Southeast Colorado PE Academy: Implementation and Outcomes in Rural Elementary Schools, 2014-16
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the implementation and outcomes of the Southeast Colorado Physical Education Academy (SECPEA). The SECPEA intervention aimed to improve the quality of physical education taught by 21 teachers in 19 rural schools in Southeast Colorado over a two-year period by supporting the implementation of an enhanced physical education program (EPE). The System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at baseline, post year one, and post year two. Post year one, a moderate and significant increase was observed in overall MVPA% per lesson. The largest increase was observed in the MVPA% during the first five minutes of lessons. Significant increases were also observed in girls’ MVPA% and for teacher promotion of MVPA. Post year two, significant positive increases were observed in the percentage of vigorous physical activity and energy expenditure rate. The SECPEA was a successful model for implementation of an EPE. Continued testing of the model in diverse settings is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".