MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prevalence and Outcomes of Prenatal Recreational Cannabis Use in High-income Countries: A Scoping Review

2020· review· en· W3106313336 on OpenAlexaff
Sareen Singh, Kristian B. Filion, HA Abenhaim, Mark J. Eisenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCannabisLegalizationRecreationEnvironmental healthRecreational DrugPregnancyRecreational usePsychiatryDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

( BJOG . 2020;127:8–16) With the potency of recreational cannabis on the rise, there is a need for an updated review of recent studies on pregnancy outcomes. Thus far, only 2 review studies have assessed the use of cannabis on maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, these reviews provided conflicting results and included studies only from before 2000. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of recreational cannabis use in pregnant women, its association with maternal and neonatal outcomes, and the potential impact of its legalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric Anesthesia DigestSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207