MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106397699

Reading native literature from a traditional indigenous perspective : contemporary novels in a Windigo society

2001· dissertation· en· W3106397699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousReading (process)Perspective (graphical)AnthropologyNative American studiesSociologyLiteratureHistorySocial sciencePolitical scienceArtVisual artsLawEcologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis I explore three novels by Aboriginal authors, using a perspective that evolves
\nfrom traditional Anishnabe teachings about the ?Windigo" character. In the Introduction, I
\nelaborate upon the reasons why a n interdisciplinary study is necessary for the advancement of
\nAboriginal education.
\nIn Chapter One, ?Literary Colonization," I formulate an Aboriginal literary criticism through
\n?inside? perspectives of Aboriginal social reality and community. I propose that through Aboriginal
\nliterary self-determination which includes youth. Elders, community, and Indigenous traditions and
\nstories, one may find an escape from literary colonization. In Chapter Two, ?The Windigo,? I focus
\non the Windigo not only as a character but also as a metaphor. I use the Windigo to explain
\nhumanity though a traditional Indigenous, multi-layered perspective of human reality.
\nIn Chapter Three, ?Silent Words and the Tradition of Respect,? I study the novel Silent Words
\nby Ruby Slipperjack for its rejection of Windigo domination and its establishment of respect for
\ncommunity. This chapter promotes Aboriginal pedagogy and traditional teachings through a study
\nof the protagonist?s journeys under the guidance of traditional teachers, from whom he learns
\nabout balanced, reciprocal relationships.
\nIn Chapter Four, ?Ravensong and the Them e of Transformation,? I study the novel Ravensong
\nby Lee Maracle in terms of resistance to assimilation and Windigo infection, noting the necessity
\nfor and possibility of transformation. Emphasizing the importance of Indigenous community to
\nIndigenous life and identity, this chapter explicates the protagonist's role as a potential ?bridge?
\nbetween non-Aboriginal and Aboriginal cultures.
\nIn Chapter Five, ?Slash. Assimilation, and Cultural Survival,? I study the novel Slash by
\nJeannette Armstrong as a challenge to Windigo, opposing assimilation and assisting cultural
\nsurvival. The protagonist?s journeys include political activist events as well as an inner exploration
\nwhere he must realize internalized oppression in himself as well as Windigo disease in his
\ncommunity and in the greater Canadian society.
\nIn the conclusion and recommendations, I suggest that the Windigo can be overcome through
\ncreative acts of literature and through informed reading of Indigenous literature from an insider perspective. I also recommend that Indigenous perspectives, such as those expressed in this
\nthesis, be accommodated by literary studies as a whole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it