MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106402469 · doi:10.5194/epsc2020-668

Martian Atmosphere CO Vertical Profiles: Results from the First Year of TGO/NOMAD Science Operations

2020· article· en· W3106402469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Justin Erwin, Shohei Aoki, Ian Thomas, Loïc Trompet, Ann Carine Vandaele, Séverine Robert, Frank Daerden, Bojan Ristic, J. J. López‐Moreno, G. Bellucci, Manish Patel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical and Acousto-Optic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNadirOccultationOrbiterMars Exploration ProgramAtmosphere of MarsAtmosphere (unit)PhysicsTrace gasSpectral resolutionAstrobiologyMartianEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingAtmospheric sciencesGeologyAstronomyMeteorologySpectral lineSatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nadir and Occultation for Mars Discovery (NOMAD) onboard ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) started the science measurements on 21 April 2018. We present results on the retrievals vertical profiles for several species in the Martian atmosphere from the first year measurements of the TGO/NOMAD. In particular, we present our progress on retrieving CO vertical profiles.NOMAD InstrumentNOMAD, the “Nadir and Occultation for Mars Discovery” spectrometer suite [1], is part of the payload of the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter mission 2016. The instrument will conduct a spectroscopic survey of Mars’ atmosphere in the UV, visible and IR wavelengths covering the 0.2-0.65 and 2.3-4.3µm spectral ranges. NOMAD is composed of three channels: a solar occulation channel (SO) operating in the IR, a limb and nadir channel (LNO) also operating in the IR, and an ultraviolet/visible channel (UVIS) that can perform all observation modes. The spectral resolutions of SO and LNO is a significant improvement on previous infrared surveys of Mars (λ/dλ~15000). Both SO and LNO consist of an acousto-optic tunable filter (AOTF) in combination with an echelle grating. Several spectral ranges are measured simultaneously at a high spectral resolution, allowing for the study of different molecular species. The design of the three channels is fully described in [2] and [3].Vertical Profile RetrievalsThe vertical sampling rate of the SO channel is typically ~1km, which provided an unprecedented vertical resolution from the surface up to ~200km. ExoMars TGO has a ~2 hour orbital period, and the SO channel operates on ~50% of the potential occultations, which leads to great monitoring of the climatology. The calibration of SO is a collaborative exercise with retrievals, but inherits many of the techniques used for the SOIR/VEX instrument described in [4]. The retrievals are performed using the software ASIMUT developed at BIRA-IASB [5], which can use Optimal Estimation Method [6] among other algorithms to retrieved atmospheric profiles.Discussion and ResultsCarbon Monoxide is a non-condensable species playing a major role in the photochemical cycle of CO2. Local and seasonal variations are expected and will give valuable constraints for the dynamical processes in the Martian atmosphere. The 2-0 band of CO centered at 2.4µm is positioned in the SO orders 186-192 (4200-4350cm-1). It is easily measurable in transmittances up to ~110km. In the figure above, we show that we have good observational coverage. In this presentation, we will talk about how we retrieve abundances from spectral absorption features, and try to isolate climatological effects from observational geometry.References[1] E. Neefs et al. (2015) Applied Optics, Vol. 54.[2] I. R. Thomas et al. (2016) Optics Express, Vol. 24.[3] A. C. Vandaele et al. (2015) Optics Express, Vol. 23.[4] L. Trompet (2016) Applied Optics, Vol. 55.[5] A. C. Vandaele (2006) Conf. Proc. of the first ‘Atmosphere Science Conference’.[6] C. D. Rodgers (2000) World Scientific.[7] A. C. Vandaele (2019) Nature 568.Acknowledgements:The NOMAD experiment is led by the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA), assisted by Co-PI teams from Spain (IAA-CSIC), Italy (INAF-IAPS), and the United Kingdom (Open University). This project acknowledges funding by the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO), with the financial and contractual coordination by the ESA Prodex Office (PEA 4000103401, 4000121493), by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIU) and by European funds under grants PGC2018-101836-B-I00 and ESP2017-87143-R (MINECO/FEDER), as well as by UK Space Agency through grants ST/R005761/1, ST/P001262/1, ST/R001405/1 and ST/R001405/1 and Italian Space Agency through grant 2018-2-HH.0. This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS under grant number 30442502 (ET_HOME). The IAA/CSIC team acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa’ award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). US investigators were supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Canadian investigators were supported by the Canadian Space Agency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical and Acousto-Optic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207