MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reliability assessment of emergency auxiliaries of an NPP using an additional steam turbine under various modes of its utilization

2020· article· en· W3106439887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Р. З. Аминов, V.E. Yurin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlackoutSteam turbineTurbineNuclear powerSteam-electric power stationPower stationNuclear engineeringNuclear power plantEngineeringReliability (semiconductor)Environmental scienceReliability engineeringCombined cycleElectric power systemMechanical engineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Under complete blackout of a station, it is possible to cool-down the VVER-1000 type reactors using the energy of residual heat release of the reactors. The calculations from past works showed in the context of Balakovo nuclear power plant, that a single low-power steam-turbine unit by utilizing the energy of residual heat release from one reactor is capable to provide electricity for two VVER-1000 power units, including the cases when the first circuit in one of the units is depressurized. This work is a continuation of the investigation of the general-station reserve systems for nuclear power plants own needs. The effectiveness of the joint installation of an additional multifunctional steam turbine and a mobile general-station diesel generator was investigated taking into account the results of a large research of the causes for not starting diesel generators at nuclear power plants, conducted by scientists from the USA and Canada, according to which the interval of the percentage of their non-start ranges from 1 to 3%. It is shown that the reliability of such concurrent redundancy of the NPP’s own needs meets the IAEA requirements. Also in the work, the reliability of the developed emergency power supply system was investigated in the conditions of the additional steam turbine stop during the night off-peak hours of the electrical load. Research has shown that this is not acceptable for the accepted conditions from a safety point of view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207