MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling and Simulation of Voltage-Controlled DC-DC Converters Using Dynamic Phasors

2020· article· en· W3106497856 on OpenAlexaff
Udoka C. Nwaneto, Andrew M. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuty cycleConvertersPhasorBuck converterPulse-width modulationComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)VoltageFlyback converterElectronic engineeringDC biasMATLABPower (physics)Boost converterElectric power systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling and simulation of DC-DC converters are essential in the design of efficient and robust energy systems, telecommunication equipment, transportation infrastructure, and healthcare devices. This paper presents computationally efficient frequency-dependent average models (FDAMs) of voltage-controlled DC-DC converters (buck, boost, and buck-boost) developed using the dynamic phasor (DP) method. By recognizing that in a DC-DC converter, the DC component dominates in the circuit variables, this paper neglects the pulse-width modulation (PWM) stage in developing control algorithms used in generating time-varying duty cycle unlike in the existing FDAMs. Rather, the time-varying duty cycle is produced by using the output voltage zeroth DP component as feedback signal while neglecting the high frequency components. This approximation simplifies the control process thereby enabling faster simulations of the FDAM models. Comparative studies involving step changes in output voltage reference and the load resistance are conducted using the detailed DC-DC converter models implemented in Simulink/Simscape (SS) platform, and the DP-based FDAMs developed in MATLAB environment in order to validate the proposed DP model's control scheme. Simulation results obtained reveal that the DP-based models are capable of accurately depicting the switching transients and steady-state conditions as the fully detailed switched models developed in SS while being more computationally efficient than the SS models. Thus, the DP-based FDAM is suitable for conducting a detailed system-level study of DC-DC converter-based power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics SocietySame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207