Freely behaving mice can brake and turn during optogenetic stimulation of the Mesencephalic Locomotor Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bstract Background Stimulation of the Mesencephalic Locomotor Region ( MLR ) is increasingly considered as a target to improve locomotor function in Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injury and stroke. A key function of the MLR is to control the speed of forward symmetrical locomotor movements. However, the ability of freely moving mammals to integrate environmental cues to brake and turn during MLR stimulation is poorly documented. Objective/hypothesis We investigated whether freely behaving mice could brake or turn based on environmental cues during MLR stimulation. Methods We stimulated the cuneiform nucleus in mice expressing channelrhodopsin in Vglut2-positive neurons in a Cre-dependent manner (Vglut2-ChR2-EYFP) using optogenetics. We detected locomotor movements using deep learning. We used patch-clamp recordings to validate the functional expression of channelrhodopsin and neuroanatomy to visualize the stimulation sites. Results Optogenetic stimulation of the MLR evoked locomotion and increasing laser power increased locomotor speed. Gait diagram and limb kinematics were similar during spontaneous and optogenetic-evoked locomotion. Mice could brake and make sharp turns (∼90⁰) when approaching a corner during MLR stimulation in an open-field arena. The speed during the turn was scaled with the speed before the turn, and with the turn angle. In a reporter mouse, many Vglut2-ZsGreen neurons were immunopositive for glutamate in the MLR. Patch-clamp recordings in Vglut2-ChR2-EYFP mice show that blue light evoked short latency spiking in MLR neurons. Conclusion MLR glutamatergic neurons are a relevant target to improve locomotor activity without impeding the ability to brake and turn when approaching an obstacle, thus ensuring smooth and adaptable navigation. H ighlights - Mice brake and turn when approaching the arena’s corner during MLR-evoked locomotion - Speed decrease is scaled to speed before the turn during MLR-evoked locomotion - Turn angle is scaled to turn speed during MLR-evoked locomotion - Gait and limb kinematics are similar during spontaneous and MLR-evoked locomotion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".