MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning Approach to Channel Sensing and Hybrid Precoding for TDD Massive MIMO Systems

2020· preprint· en· W3106584419 on OpenAlexaff
Kareem M. Attiah, Foad Sohrabi, Wei Yu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHuawei Technologies
KeywordsPrecodingTelecommunications linkChannel (broadcasting)MIMOBeamformingComputer scienceDuplex (building)Electronic engineeringOverhead (engineering)Channel state informationEngineeringComputer engineeringComputer networkTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a deep learning approach to channel sensing and downlink hybrid analog and digital beamforming for massive multiple-input multiple-output systems with a limited number of radio-frequency chains operating in the time-division duplex mode at millimeter frequency. The conventional downlink precoding design hinges on the two-step process of first estimating the high-dimensional channel based on the uplink pilots received through the channel sensing matrices, then designing the precoding matrices based on the estimated channel. This two-step process is, however, not necessarily optimal, especially when the pilot length is short. This paper shows that by designing the analog sensing and the downlink precoding matrices directly from the received pilots without the intermediate channel estimation step, the overall system performance can be significantly improved. Specifically, we propose a channel sensing and hybrid precoding methodology that divides the pilot phase into an analog and a digital training phase. A deep neural network is utilized in the first phase to design the uplink channel sensing and the downlink analog beamformer. Subsequently, we fix the analog beamformers and design the digital precoder based on the equivalent low-dimensional channel. A key feature of the proposed deep learning architecture is that it decomposes into parallel independent single-user DNNs so that the overall design is generalizable to systems with an arbitrary number of users. Numerical comparisons reveal that the proposed methodology requires significantly less training overhead than the channel recovery based counterparts, and can approach the performance of systems with full channel state information with relatively few pilots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207