MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106621014 · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.076

RFID in Manufacturing: An Implementation Case in the SEPT Learning Factory

2020· article· en· W3106621014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Manufacturing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraceabilityManufacturing engineeringFactory (object-oriented programming)VisibilityEngineeringDigital manufacturingComputer scienceSystems engineeringSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the application of RFID technologies in a Learning Factory (LF) – an academic environment that mimics a manufacturing line – that has been developed at McMaster University in the School of Engineering Practice and Technology. The use of RFID digital technologies in the manufacturing line implemented in the SEPT LF, and a strategy to implement them are presented. The ways in which RFID systems allow traceability of manufactured products and provide visibility of the production data that is an essential element in the implementation of Industry 4.0 concepts in manufacturing are discussed. Several types of applications that implement RFID technologies are described. Applications of using RFID technologies in manufacturing, storage, assembly, testing and packaging are listed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it