Jean-Claude DAUMAS, La Révolution matérielle. Une histoire de la consommation. France XIXe-XXIe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Domaine longtemps négligé par les historiens, déplore d'entrée de jeu Jean-Claude Daumas, la consommation marchande est à l'origine d'une véritable révolution qui a touché les genres de vie et le quotidien des ménages.Cette révolution avait été entrevue par Michelet dans Le Peuple (1846), cité avec pertinence dès la première page de l'ouvrage.Cette histoire de la consommation ratisse large, car elle va bien au-delà de la considération des seuls consommateurs et des statistiques sur les ménages, embrassant l'action des forces diverses -industriels, petite et grande distribution, publicitaires, médias, mouvements de consommateurs, marketing, pouvoirs publics, influences étrangères -et surtout, évitant les simplifications abusives et les positions idéologiques sur la consommation.Ce sont là les grandes qualités de cet ouvrage de synthèse.Jean-Claude DAUMAS, La Révolution matérielle.Une histoire de la consommation...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".