Classifying and clustering malicious advertisement uniform resource locators using deep learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Malicious online advertisement detection has attracted increasing attention in recent years in both academia and industry. The existing advertising blocking systems are vulnerable to the evolution of new attacks and can cause time latency issues by analyzing web content or querying remote servers. This article proposes a lightweight detection system for advertisement Uniform resource locators (URLs) detection, depending only on lexical‐based features. Deep learning algorithms are used for online advertising classification. After optimizing the deep neural network architecture, our proposed approach can achieve satisfactory results with false negative rate as low as 1.31%. We also design a novel unsupervised method for data clustering. With the implementation of AutoEncoder for feature preprocessing and t‐distributed stochastic neighbor embedding for clustering and visualization, our model outperforms other dimensionality reduction algorithms by generating clear clusterings for different URL families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it