MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Energy Harvesting Solution for IoT Devices in 5G Networks

2020· article· en· W3106702740 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Eshaghi, Rashid Rashidzadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy harvestingComputer scienceRectifier (neural networks)WirelessSchottky diodeAntenna (radio)Extremely high frequencyInternet of ThingsElectrical engineeringRectennaWireless sensor networkEnergy (signal processing)Power (physics)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEmbedded systemDiodeComputer networkEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Things (IoT) and IoT applications will experience significant growth as the fifth-generation (5G) of wireless technology matures and becomes more widely adopted. How to power on billions of low power wireless IoT devices has initiated a new interest in energy harvesting. The 5G technology will open new opportunities to design circuits to efficiently extract energy from millimeter waves to power on IoT devices. In this paper, an energy harvesting circuit is designed and simulated using Advanced Design System (ADS) which is compatible with 5G technology. A microstrip patch antenna with -17.35 dB return loss at 11.02 GHz is designed and implemented. A rectifier using a Schottky diode is also designed to operate at high frequencies. Simulation results indicate that the proposed solution can extract energy from incoming waves at 11.02 GHz and generate 1.18 V across an IoT sensor with an efficiency of 87%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207