Geomaterial Characterization and Stability Assessment of Hydraulic Fill Dams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this research study, the stability of a hydraulic fill dam located in a newly declared seismically hazardous zone in north Texas was evaluated, incorporating the effect of geomaterial variability existing in the dam. Hydraulic fill dams exhibit highly variable geomaterial conditions due to the method of construction and are prone to stability issues during earthquakes. Hence, a comprehensive study was needed to account for such variations in geomaterial properties and assess the stability of the dam rather than performing routine analysis using representative geomaterial properties for the shell, core, and foundation of the dam. Cone penetration tests were performed on the dam to study geomaterial properties and their variabilities. These results were used to develop three-dimensional (3D) visualization models using kriging analysis. The geomaterial properties obtained from the visualization models were subsequently used in the slope stability analyses. The developed visualization models depicted the variation of geomaterial properties within the dam. The use of the visualization models has led to the development of an innovative approach for performing stability analyses of earthen dams with high geomaterial variability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".