MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106723402 · doi:10.1145/3408308.3427978

Can Future Wireless Networks Detect Fires?

2020· article· en· W3106723402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWirelessComputer scienceWireless networkComputer networkEnvironmental scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latencies, operating ranges, and false positive rates for existing indoor fire detection systems like smoke detectors and sprinkler systems are far from ideal. This paper explores the use of wireless radio frequency (RF) signals to detect indoor fires with low latency, through walls and other occlusions. We build on past research focused on wireless sensing, and introduce RFire, a system which uses millimeter wave technology and deep learning to extract instances of fire. We perform line-of-sight (LoS) and occluded non-LoS experiments with fire at different distances, and find that RFire achieves a best-result mean latency of 24 seconds when trained and tested in multiple environments. RFire yields at least a 4 times improvement in mean alarm latency over today's alarms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire Detection and Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207