Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dès sa genèse, l’ Association des professionnels de l’information et de la documentation a développé une, ou plutôt des pratiques éditoriales. Adossées aux innovations technologiques et aux mutations de la fonction documentaire, ces pratiques s’inscrivent dans une logique de partage, de communication et de transfert de savoirs ; elles s’appuient sur des savoir-faire et des processus professionnels. Le produit phare de l’ADBS, la revue I2D, en témoigne. Objectifs : répondre au mieux aux préoccupations de ses adhérents, capitaliser, apporter de la valeur ajoutée. Entre production (via des ouvrages et des revues), gestion et transformation de contenus (via le site, les réseaux, les groupes participatifs), et formations (via les stages), l’ADBS explore de vastes territoires éditoriaux. Pour autant, elle ne cesse de se questionner et de s’adapter, dans un modèle de work in process .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.149 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.025 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".