Banff klasifikacija patohistologije bubrežnih presadaka
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Do ranih 1990-ih nije postojala standardizirana međunarodna klasifikacija biopsija bubrežnih presadaka. To je rezultiralo značajnom heterogenošću patohistoloških nalaza između različitih centara. Skupina nefropatologa, nefrologa i transplantacijskih kirurga napravila je u Banffu (Alberta, Kanada) 1991. prvi klasifikacijski sustav histoloških promjena u transplantiranom bubregu koji je pružio smjernice za patohistološku i kliničku dijagnozu te omogućio usporedbu između istraživačkih i kliničkih studija za dijagnozu, liječenje i ishod transplantiranih bubrega. Bio je to početak danas općeprihvaćene Banff klasifikacije. Navedeni eksperti nastavili su se sastajati svakih nekoliko godina te su Banff klasifikaciju prilagođavali i mijenjali u skladu s najnovijim spoznajama. Cilj rada je prikazati Banff klasifikaciju bubrežnih presadaka kroz njenu povijest od početaka do posljednjeg izvještaja. Dijagnostička procjena patologije bubrežnih presadaka uvelike je poboljšana, kvantificirana i klinički dokazana, ali mnoga pitanja još treba proučiti. Trenutne preporuke se i dalje klinički vrednuju, a izvještaj o tome i nove teme bit će raspravljeni na jubilarnom sastanku o tridesetoj godišnjici Banff susreta 2021. godine u gradu Banffu iz kojega je klasifikacija i potekla.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".