MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106823226 · doi:10.29244/ijsa.v4i3.585

PENGGEROMBOLAN SUBSEKTOR INDUSTRI BERDASARKAN PERKEMBANGAN INDEKS PRODUKSI MENGGUNAKAN PREDICTION-BASED CLUSTERING

2020· article· en· W3106823226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agustin Faradila, Utami Dyah Syafitri, I Made Sumertajaya

Bibliographic record

VenueIndonesian Journal of Statistics and Its Applications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisQuarter (Canadian coin)Cluster (spacecraft)Operations managementIndex (typography)Agricultural economicsStatisticsBusinessAgricultural scienceEngineeringComputer scienceEconomicsMathematicsGeographyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistics Indonesia (BPS) noted that there has been a decrease in the contribution of the industrial sector to the national GDP even though it had provided a significant multiplier effect on national economic growth. Therefore, it is necessary to cluster the industrial subsector based on its growth patterns so that the optimization of development results can be achieved. Prediction-based clustering is part of time series clustering (TSclust) which aims to form clusters based on prediction characteristics so that it can be used to choose a cluster that will become a mainstay industry in the future. This study focused on applying prediction-based clustering in the large and medium industrial sub-sector for a prediction period of 1 month, 1 quarter, and 1 semester. The data used in this study was the production index data from January 2010 to December 2018. The results showed that the best cluster for 1 month consisted of 5 groups, for 1 quarter consisted of 4 groups and for 1 semester consisted of 2 groups. Thus, it was concluded that the food industry; leather industry, leather goods, and footwear; and the pharmaceutical industry, chemical drug products, and traditional medicine could be chosen to be the mainstay industry in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndonesian Journal of Statistics and Its ApplicationsSame topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207