Speech Intelligibility Prediction Using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spectro-temporal modulations are believed to mediate the analysis of speech sounds in the human primary auditory cortex. Inspired by humans' robustness in comprehending speech in challenging acoustic environments, we propose an intrusive speech intelligibility prediction (SIP) algorithm, wSTMI, for normal-hearing listeners based on spectro-temporal modulation analysis (STMA) of the clean and degraded speech signals. In the STMA, each of 55 modulation frequency channels contributes an intermediate intelligibility measure. A sparse linear model with parameters optimized using Lasso regression results in combining the intermediate measures of 8 of the most salient channels for SIP. In comparison with a suite of 10 SIP algorithms, wSTMI performs consistently well across 13 datasets, which together cover degradation conditions including modulated noise, noise reduction processing, reverberation, near-end listening enhancement, and speech interruption. We show that the optimized parameters of wSTMI may be interpreted in terms of modulation transfer functions of the human auditory system. Thus, the proposed approach offers evidence affirming previous studies of the perceptual characteristics underlying speech signal intelligibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".