Le chantre et la société paroissiale du Québec au XIXe siècle : la musique du lutrin et son temps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l’auteur cherche à dresser une première synthèse de la vie musicale dans les églises paroissiales au Québec durant le XIX e siècle, en prenant pour toile de fond la société paroissiale alors en plein développement. Ce premier exercice de synthèse s’appuie essentiellement sur les archives et les monographies locales, sources qui n’ont pas encore été systématiquement exploitées et traitées. En prenant comme figure centrale et emblématique le maître chantre, représentant de la tradition populaire, cet article cherche à ébaucher une histoire des rapports entre la société québécoise et la musique liturgique, histoire confrontée au courant international de la restauration liturgique et grégorienne, et perméable aux influences de la musique non liturgique, voire profane, alors en vogue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".