Recortes da prisão: um mosaico de experiências literárias nas prisões federais brasileiras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo propõe-se a reunir recortes da prática literária na prisão, por meio de relatos e depoimentos de leitores encarcerados, que corporificam e legitimam, à luz de teóricos importantes da Estética da Recepção, a prática da leitura na prisão como atividade emancipadora. Aqui, interessa-nos a figura desse leitor, seu comportamento e os impactos da sua prática de leitura, sobretudo considerando a política pública de remição de pena pela leitura instituída pela Portaria Conjunta nº 276/2012, do Ministério da Justiça e do Departamento Penitenciário Nacional. Trata-se de recortes de relatos e depoimentos produzidos por presos das Penitenciárias Federais de Campo Grande (MS) e Catanduvas (PR), em Regime Disciplinar Diferenciado (RDD), entre os anos de 2010 e 2013, no âmbito de pesquisa de doutoramento. Os resultados reforçam a relevância da leitura no cárcere para além da ideia de remição de pena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".