Reallocating Cancer Surgery Payments for Alternate Level of Care in Ontario: What Are the Options?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine comment les journes d'hospitalisation d' autres niveaux de soins (ANS) sont finances grce au modle de financement pour les chirurgies oncologiques en Ontario et value les choix stratgiques pour mieux traiter la question des journes ANS. On y mesure la contribution des journes ANS au financement des hpitaux ainsi que l'impact de la suppression du financement pour les chirurgies oncologiques ou de sa raffectation. Bien que les cots associs aux journes ANS en chirurgie oncologique soient faibles, cet article met en vidence le besoin de stratgies politiques pour raligner le financement dans l' ensemble du systme de sant de l'Ontario afin de mieux rpondre aux besoins des patients en attente d' ANS, de rduire la pression sur la capacit des lits d'hpital et d' amliorer l' optimisation des ressources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".