Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure of the economic environment in North America has changed markedly over the last decade by having NAFTA gone into effect on Januare 1, 1994. This paper provides a chance to see the current situation of NAFTA and analyzes economics effects of NAFTA on U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Actually the NAFTA has become one of the world`s best-known free trade agreements. It is also significant on the reason that for the first time ever, a developing country sat down with two industrialized countries and created and agreement that opens its economy to the challenges and opportunities of the North American marketplace. Seven years ago, three countries were in the midst of vigorous debate about the economic future of their own country. They debated whether they should open their economy to greater competition and secure a new set of rules to govern their trade relations with each other. As a result of the NAFTA, trade in North America has incredibly increased. This feature is compatible with the main purposes of the NAFTA: (1) elimination of barriers to trade and (2) promotion of fair competition. The trade pattern in this region indicates that Canadian and Mexican trade-dependence on US is increasing in the recent years. Thus we expect that a rise of fall of US economy would directly affect Canadian and Mexican economies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.104 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".