Wohnsituation von Menschen mit Substanzgebrauchsstörungen im akut-psychiatrischen Behandlungssetting in Berlin – eine querschnittliche Patientenbefragung
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the housing situation, service use and substance use among patients with substance use disorders seeking psychiatric treatment. METHODS: Structured interview among 540 psychiatric inpatients including day clinics in a psychiatric centre in Berlin, Germany. RESULTS: Patients under instable housing conditions were significantly more often diagnosed with a comorbid psychotic disorder and were significantly younger when first psychiatric or substance use treatment occurred, on average before onset of homelessness. CONCLUSION: Homelessness among people with substance use disorder seeking psychiatric treatment is associated with disadvantageous treatment factors such as early age of psychiatric treatment and comorbid psychotic disorders. Therefore, addressing social difficulties especially after inpatient treatment and close cooperation between different care providers should be of high importance among these groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it