MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107222777 · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ab31da

Matrix logarithms and range of the exponential maps for the symmetry groups SL(2,R),SL(2,C) , and the Lorentz group

2019· article· en· W3107222777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Physicists know that covering the continuously connected component <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic"></mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>↑</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> of the Lorentz group can be achieved through two Lie algebra exponentials, whereas one exponential is sufficient for compact symmetry groups like SU ( N ) or SO ( N ). On the other hand, both the general Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula for the combination of matrix exponentials in a series of higher order commutators, and the possibility to define the logarithm <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>ln</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:munder accentunder="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">̲</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> of a general matrix <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:munder accentunder="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">̲</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> </mml:math> through the Jordan normal form, seem to naively suggest that even for non-compact groups a single exponential should be sufficient. We provide explicit constructions of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>ln</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:munder accentunder="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">̲</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> for all matrices <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:munder accentunder="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">̲</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> </mml:math> in the fundamental representations of the non-compact groups <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">SL</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">SL</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> , and SO (1, 2). The construction for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">SL</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> also yields logarithms for SO (1, 3) through the spinor representations. However, it is well known that single Lie algebra exponentials are not sufficient to cover the Lie groups <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">SL</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">SL</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> . Therefore we revisit the maximal neighbourhoods <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic"></mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>⊂</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">SL</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it