MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107233561 · doi:10.20858/sjsutst.2020.109.1

ENGINEERING DESIGN OF A MANIPULATOR FOR MOUNTING AN AIR SUSPENSION COMPRESSOR TO A CAR CHASSIS

2020· article· en· W3107233561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology Series Transport · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransport and Logistics Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChassisManipulator (device)Automotive engineeringGas compressorSuspension (topology)Air compressorEngineeringProcess (computing)Line (geometry)Engineering design processMechanical engineeringManufacturing engineeringComputer scienceRobotic arm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is aimed at the engineering design of a manipulator, which is pneumatically controlled. It will serve for mounting the compressor of an air suspension system to the chassis of a sport utility vehicle (SUV) produced in the Slovak Republic. The manipulator will be used on an assembly line, on which SUVs are assembled. The designed device belongs to a group of dedicated devices, which are not produced within a serial production, however, it is the only functional prototype. Together with the manipulator structure, a pneumatic part of the assembly line including individual components, schemes and the pneumatic system will be proposed. Within the project process, all necessary customer demands, technical and safety standards have to be met. Moreover, ergonomic requirements for handling the device and other acts on the workplace have to be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it