Predicting heterogeneity in clone-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities using single-cell transcriptomic signatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary While understanding heterogeneity in molecular signatures across patients underpins precision oncology, there is increasing appreciation for taking intra-tumor heterogeneity into account. Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) technologies have facilitated investigations into the role of intra-tumor transcriptomic heterogeneity (ITTH) in tumor biology and evolution, but their application to in silico models of drug response has not been explored. Based on large-scale analysis of cancer omics datasets, we highlight the utility of ITTH for predicting clinical outcomes. We then show that heterogeneous gene expression signatures obtained from scRNA-seq data can be accurately analyzed (80%) in a recommender system framework (CaDRReS-Sc) for in silico drug response prediction. Patient-derived cell lines capturing transcriptomic heterogeneity from primary and metastatic tumors were used as in vitro proxies for validating monotherapy predictions (Pearson r>0.6), as well as optimal drug combinations to target different subclonal populations (>10% improvement). Applying CaDRReS-Sc to the increasing number of publicly available tumor scRNA-seq datasets can serve as an in silico screen for further in vitro and in vivo drug repurposing studies. Graphical abstract Highlights Large-scale analysis to establish the impact of transcriptomic heterogeneity within tumors on clinical outcomes Calibrated recommender system for drug response prediction based on single-cell RNA-seq data (CaDRReS-Sc) Prediction of drug response in patient-derived cell lines with transcriptomic heterogeneity In silico identification of drug combinations that work based on clonal vulnerabilities
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".