MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107387809 · doi:10.1504/ijdmb.2020.10033716

MHCherryPan: a novel pan-specific model for binding affinity prediction of class I HLA-peptide

2020· article· en· W3107387809 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman leukocyte antigenBenchmark (surveying)Computational biologyAlleleImmune systemArtificial immune systemPeptideComputer scienceBiologyClass (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceAntigenImmunologyGeneGeneticsBiochemistryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) system or complex plays an irreplaceable role in regulating the humans' immune system. Accurate prediction of peptide binding with HLA can efficiently promote to identify those neoantigens, which potentially make a great change in immune drug development. HLA is one of the most polymorphic genetic systems in humans, and thousands of HLA allelic versions exist (Choo, 2007). Owing the high polymorphism of HLA complex, it is still pretty difficult to accurately predict the binding affinity. In this paper, we proposed a novel algorithm which combined convolutional neural network and long short-term memory to solve this problem. Our model has been tested with the experimental benchmark from IEDB and shows the state-of-the-art performance compared with other currently popular algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it