Saturation transfer properties of tumour xenografts derived from prostate cancer cell lines 22Rv1 and DU145
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Histopathology is currently the most reliable tool in assessing the aggressiveness and prognosis of solid tumours. However, developing non-invasive modalities for tumour evaluation remains crucial due to the side effects and complications caused by biopsy procedures. In this study, saturation transfer MRI was used to investigate the microstructural and metabolic properties of tumour xenografts in mice derived from the prostate cancer cell lines 22Rv1 and DU145, which express different aggressiveness. The magnetization transfer (MT) and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effects, which are associated with the microstructural and metabolic properties in biological tissue, respectively, were analyzed quantitatively and compared amongst different tumour types and regions. Histopathological staining was performed as a reference. Higher cellular density and metabolism expressed in more aggressive tumours (22Rv1) were associated with larger MT and CEST effects. High collagen content in the necrotic regions might explain their higher MT effects compared to tumour regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".