MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3107459492 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-14090

Deep Learning Methods for Abnormality Detection and Segmentation in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Images

2020· dissertation· en· W3107459492 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Zabihollahy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationArtificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingCoronal planeComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningVoxelEffective diffusion coefficientSagittal planePattern recognition (psychology)Steady-state free precession imagingRadiologyNuclear medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical imaging is vital to non-invasive diagnosis and prognosis of medical abnormalities.Medical image acquisition has greatly advanced in terms of acquisition speed and the ability to resolve fine objects over the last decades.However, advances in technology have increased the size of the image and number of images to be interpreted by radiologists.Imaging studies of a single patient may now consist of hundreds of images, reformatted in multiple imaging planes with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction.Detection of abnormalities, such as cancer or scar tissue, is an important part of disease diagnosis based on medical images.Abnormalities in tissue may manifest as differences in image intensity, contrast, and texture to the normal tissue in medical images.Currently, the medical images are interpreted manually by clinical experts, which is a tedious task and subject to large inter-and intra-operator variability due to observer limitations (e.g., constrained human visual perception, fatigue, or distraction) and the complexity of the clinical cases themselves (e.g., overlapping structures).Therefore, automated analysis of medical images is highly desirable.Parallel to the developments in imaging hardware, machine learning technologies, including deep learning (DL) methods, have evolved over the last decade and are providing exciting solutions in identification, classification, and quantification of abnormalities in medical images.In this dissertation, with the availability of the unique datasets of kidney computed tomography (CT) scans, prostate and cardiac magnetic resonance images (MRI) through a clinical collaboration with the Ottawa Hospital and the Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta at the University of Calgary, I have focused on the computer-aided detection of kidney and prostate tumors and cardiac scar tissue as medical abnormalities.The goal of this dissertation is to describe the development of novel DL-based methodologies for the detection and segmentation of abnormalities in 3D CT scans and MR images for three high-impact clinical v applications.These applications are computer-aided detection of kidney tumors (renal masses) on CT scans, quantification of scar tissue in the heart in 3D cardiac MRI, and prostate tumor localization in multi-slice MRI.Our research has novelty in both methodology and clinical applications.For the application of detecting kidney cancer, I developed a decision fusion of convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method for renal masses classification into cyst versus solid and then categorized solid renal masses into benign and malignant.For the application of detecting scar tissue in the heart, I designed a novel algorithm that comprehensively learns and integrates inter-and intra-slice features from 3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-MR images and allows to accurately delineate LV scar fully automatically.For the application of detecting prostate cancer (PCa), I described a U-Net-based methodology to segment prostate zones from T2-weighted (T2W) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map prostate MR images as a fundamental requirement for automated diagnosis of PCa.Furthermore, I presented an ensemble learning system for fully automated localization of peripheral zone PCa from the ADC map that has not been described previously.In this dissertation the method developed for different applications progressed from a CNN to the cascaded multi-planar U-Net and ensemble learning system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→