MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107523488 · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00779-0

Author Correction: A community-based transcriptomics classification and nomenclature of neocortical cell types

2021· article· en· W3107523488 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael Yuste, Michael Hawrylycz, Nadia Aalling, Argel Aguilar‐Valles, Detlev Arendt, Rubén Armañanzas, Giorgio A. Ascoli, Concha Bielza, Vahid Bokharaie, Tobias Bergmann, Irina Bystron, Marco Capogna, YoonJeung Chang, Ann M. Clemens, Christiaan P. J. de Kock, Javier DeFelipe, Sandra Esmeralda Dos Santos, Keagan Dunville, Dirk Feldmeyer, Richárd Fiáth, Gord Fishell, Angelica Foggetti, Xuefan Gao, Parviz Ghaderi, Natalia A. Goriounova, Onur Güntürkün, Kenta M. Hagihara, Vanessa Jane Hall, Moritz Helmstaedter, Suzana Herculano‐Houzel, Markus M. Hilscher, Hajime Hirase, Jens Hjerling‐Leffler, Rebecca D. Hodge, Z. Josh Huang, Rafiq Huda, Konstantin Khodosevich, Ole Kiehn, Henner Koch, Eric S. Kuebler, Malte Kühnemund, Pedro Larrañaga, Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt, Emma Louise Louth, Jan H. Lui, Huibert D. Mansvelder, Óscar Marín, Julio Martínez-Trujillo, Homeira Moradi Chameh, Alok Nath Mohapatra, Hermany Munguba, Maiken Nedergaard, Pavel Němec, Netanel Ofer, Ulrich Pfisterer, Samuel Pontes-Quero, William Redmond, Jean Rossier, Joshua R. Sanes, Richard H. Scheuermann, Esther Serrano‐Saiz, Jochen F. Staiger, Péter Somogyi, Gábor Tamás, Andreas S. Tolias, Maria Antonietta Tosches, Miguel Turrero Garcίa, Christian Wozny, Thomas V. Wuttke, Yong Liu, Juan Yuan, Hongkui Zeng, Ed S. Lein

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Neuroscience · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityKrembil FoundationCarleton University
FundersLundbeckfonden
KeywordsNomenclatureNeuroscienceNeocortexCell typeBiologyPsychologyCognitive scienceCellZoologyGeneticsTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00779-0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature NeuroscienceSame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207