MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107590465 · doi:10.3138/seminar.57.1.2

Heinrich von Kleist’s “Marquise von O….”: Literary Honesty and the Precarious Potential of Disclosure

2020· article· en· W3107590465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Nolan

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonestyPerformative utteranceScholarshipAestheticsContext (archaeology)LiteratureCynicismPsychologySociologyPhilosophyArtSocial psychologyHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kleist’s early prose tale begins with the announcement of the Marquise’s unusual circumstances in the local intelligence gazettes. The Marquise’s announcement calls on readers to reflect on the function of honesty and sincerity in public texts. The presentation of something unsettling in this opening scene quickly demonstrates that honesty is always more than mere adherence to truth. By paying close attention to the announcement made in Kleist’s text, this article seeks to revise an important perspective found in scholarship on Kleist by viewing his emphasis on privacy, transgression, and individual honesty not as a retreat from emerging public discourse but instead as performative acts of and reflections on disclosure. To do so, this article considers Kleist’s novella in the context of ongoing work in critical theory on the way disclosure informs our understanding of aesthetics in public culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicGerman Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207