Eleomelanite, (K2Pb)Cu4O2(SO4)4, a new mineral species from the Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The new mineral eleomelanite, (K2Pb)Cu4O2(SO4)4, was found in the Arsenatnaya fumarole on the Second scoria cone of the Northern Breakthrough of the Great Tolbachik Fissure Eruption, Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. It is associated with euchlorine, fedotovite, wulffite, chalcocyanite, dolerophanite, dravertite, hermannjahnite, alumoklyuchevskite, klyuchevskite, piypite, cryptochalcite, cesiodymite, anglesite, langbeinite, calciolangbeinite, metathénardite, belomarinaite, aphthitalite, krasheninnikovite, steklite, anhydrite, hematite, tenorite, sanidine, sylvite, halite, lammerite, urusovite, and gold. Eleomelanite occurs as interrupted crusts up to 6 mm across and up to 0.3 mm thick consisting of equant, prismatic, or tabular crystals or grains up to 0.3 mm. It is translucent and black. The luster is oleaginous on crystal faces and vitreous on a cleavage surface. Dcalc is 3.790 g/cm3. Eleomelanite is optically biaxial (–), α 1.646(3), β 1.715(6), γ 1.734(6), 2Vmeas. = 60(15)°. The chemical composition (wt.%, electron-microprobe) is K2O 9.62, Rb2O 0.49, Cs2O 0.24, CaO 1.23, CuO 35.28, PbO 19.25, SO3 34.78, total 100.89. The empirical formula calculated based on 18 O apfu is (K1.88Pb0.79Ca0.20Rb0.05Cs0.02)Σ2.94Cu4.07S3.99O18. Eleomelanite is monoclinic, P21/n, a 9.3986(3), b 4.8911(1), c 18.2293(5) Å, β 104.409(3)°, V 811.63(4) Å3, and Z = 2. The strongest reflections of the powder XRD pattern [d,Å(I)(hkl)] are: 7.38(44)(101), 3.699(78)(112), , 3.173(40)(211), 2.915(35)(114), 2.838(35)(204), , and . The crystal structure was solved using single-crystal XRD data, R1 = 4.78%. It is based on heteropolyhedral Cu–S–O chains composed of Cu-centered polyhedra with [4+1+1] Cu2+ coordination and SO4 tetrahedra. Adjacent Cu–S–O chains are connected via chains of (K,Pb)O8 and KO10 polyhedra. Eleomelanite belongs to a novel structure type but has common structural features with klyuchevskite, alumoklyuchevskite, wulffite, parawulffite, and piypite. The name is derived from the Greek ελαιν (eleon), oil, and μλας (melas), black, due to its black color and oleaginous luster on crystal faces that are uncommon for sulfate minerals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".