MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107777305 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2020.3039519

Near Real-Time Soil Moisture in China Retrieved From CyGNSS Reflectivity

2020· article· en· W3107777305 on OpenAlexafffund
Qingyun Yan, Shaoqi Gong, Shuanggen Jin, Weimin Huang, Cunjie Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersStartup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyCanadian Space AgencyChinese Academy of SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRemote sensingConsistency (knowledge bases)GeolocationSatelliteComputer scienceMean squared errorEnvironmental scienceAlgorithmMeteorologyStatisticsMathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceGeologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a novel scheme to retrieve soil moisture (SM) from the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CyGNSS) data, which is accomplished by using a bagged regression trees (BRT) algorithm with the inputs being the CyGNSS-derived products, the corresponding geolocation, and associated climate type. This algorithm is validated with thein situhourly SM data acquired by China’s automatic SM observation stations throughout the year 2018. High consistency between the retrieved SM results and the measured SM is achieved, with a correlation coefficient of 0.86 and a root-mean-square error of 0.05 cm3/cm3. The results obtained in this work indicate that the proposed BRT-based method can effectively estimate SM from CyGNSS data in different scenarios of various station locations and climate types in a near real-time manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207